Over 59425

Co2 Politics

earthquakes release CO2 -

Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -

CO2 -

the stupidity of liberals -

climate can be effected by weaker magnetic field -

TAGS: earth magnetic poles overdue for a switch bigger problem than co2
Rating: 4.14/5

More politifakes by OTC

fauxnews - July 20, 2014, 2:07 pm
No, the point YOU are missing is... Is it b'utter or is it Parkay? X-D
OTC - July 20, 2014, 9:15 am
You really missing the point about data? lol
fauxnews - July 19, 2014, 5:20 pm
You are really comparing b***er to climate change? lol
OTC - July 19, 2014, 4:55 pm
There was enough data to prove b***er was bad for, now its not
EmmaRoydes - July 16, 2014, 11:45 am
so far, all that's been proven is that the climate change models suck and produce bogus results. Now there's some d***ing evidence.
fauxnews - July 15, 2014, 12:40 am
...fortunately, there is enough data in the public record showing the work of these scientists have stood the test of scrutiny. There is zero evidence to suggest that this consensus has been bought off by the 'dam gum guvment.' Your move, OTC.
fauxnews - July 15, 2014, 12:38 am
The issue IS climate change. We are still trying to figure out how this poster is supposed to fit into it. If you are discussing the 97%-99% consensus of scientists, then you were the one that mentioned govt funding...
OTC - July 15, 2014, 12:05 am
My bad again, I thought the issue was climate change, not whether i trust or like someone
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 4:08 pm
Okay...so if the government 'pays you' then they must be untrustworthy?Yes...I agree with that up to a point.But why do you trust politicians at all?Doesn't seem to bother you when it's a govt paid employee you like(aka. Cheney).Cant have it both ways,OTC
OTC - July 14, 2014, 3:46 pm
My bad, i didn't realize the 99% question was related to the earth magnetic field
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 3:32 pm
What issue? That the magnetic Earth field has nothing do with the debate over climate change other than you, idiotically, using it as a red-herring? LOGIC FAIL Try again.
OTC - July 14, 2014, 3:25 pm
Classic, can't argue the issue so attack the opposition
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 1:29 pm
*times up!*Sounds like you're walking it off.Great idea!Well,I might be around tonite if u actually have something 2 say.On a serious note, fun jousting with you :-)Just stay away from the homophobic crap and we'll be fine.Have a nice day.Cheers, mate :-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 1:22 pm
*jeopardy music almost finished* Time is almost up. Man or chicken? Wait don't answer that. *looking at my watch* Got nothing?
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 1:14 pm
*jeopardy music playing* This is final Jeopardy. Make your answer count. Round is almost up. Be sure to have your answer, in question form, that is. :-D Waiting...
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 1:03 pm
In the meanwhile, let me know when you are done with your little meltdown. Sounds like you aren't done yet. Can you provide me a time frame on your temper tantrum? Haven't got all day here you know. :-) Waiting...
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 1:01 pm
*yawn* You can't have it both ways, stoolio. With your patented cliche "you're-on-drugs, p'oopie pants!" post, you show your hand and expose yourself as the angry troll you are after all. You're a walking mess. Then again, most sore losers are. Tissue?:-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:57 pm
lolololololol... See how easy you betray yourself. LMAO... You want to take the high road (so people will think you are above this and it doesn't bother you) but then you go for the cheap insult (the drug thing) b/c you can't resist the low road...
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:54 pm
really? 68899? did the drugs kick in that fast?
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:53 pm
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:50 pm
See comment #68899 for my response (when you're raging, you are pretty much saying the same thing) ;-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:48 pm
Hey, if 'wishful thinking' will make you feel better and help you calm down, then knock yourself out. Go for it, mate. :-) In the meanwhile, let me know when you are done with your little meltdown :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:47 pm
Nobody will buy that bullsh1t except you. Sorry, but I think it's time that you reset all of those b***ons and replace the ones that you spilled tears on before they short out and electrocute you.
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:43 pm
Yes, I know you're angry. Need a hug? :-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:42 pm
...cuz last I checked, stoolio, isn't a member here.But it IS a funny reference to 'crap',which you've been full of today,hence the moniker. Again,it's funny YOU choose to read something else into it.Trying to tell us something, stoolio? ;-) Nice try.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:42 pm
project much?
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:41 pm
You are hilarious, your reference to stoolio was way before my crankyhead jab and I ignored it until you pushed it.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:40 pm
I can understand your fear, youtube videos are sooooooo dangerous to people who don't have the smarts to recognize them.
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:39 pm
Nah, when you call me "cranky head" I can sarcastically return the favor...especially considering the irony there. ;-) And, truth be told, I don't care what YOU believe. I'm just not going to let you get away putting an accusation into my mouth...
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:39 pm
tell you what, why don't you get out of attack dog mode and address the issues? Oh, that's right, you are fauxnews, the underdog, the one whose b***ons get pushed in so easily. Keep it up, you are really characterizing yourself as a b-grade clown.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:37 pm
Let's see, in this thread you used stoolio and arnnatz in reference to me, yet you ignorantly now claim that you didn't accuse me of sock puppeting. What a lousy liar you are. Do you actually believe the crap you type?
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:30 pm
*jeopardy music playing* Round is almost up. Be sure to have your answer, in question form, that is. :-D
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:24 pm
*yawn*Guess you aren't done thrashing on your floor yet. Admittedly,it would be hard to type a response in the middle of a tantrum. Fine then. Just Let me know when you are done having your little meltdown.I'll wait a little longer...but just a little :-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:10 pm
Nah,Im not accusing you of being 'anything.' I didn't use "upon your return" to imply that. Funny that 'you chose' to read that meaning into it tho.Looks like something I indadvertedly said triggered a waterfall. Lemme know when you're done crying it out.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 12:06 pm
My return? If you think I'm a sock puppet, it's easy to put your money where your pie hole is and just go to mooo and find out. But you won't do that because you you are full of it and will make some lame crankyhead excuse like, "No it's fun being stupid"
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 12:02 pm
*yawn* Like Miss Priss once told you, we don't click your links. Sorry! (see comment #65524) Loose agreement some of us made upon your return. Done having your meltdown yet? I will wait a little longer... :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:57 am
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:55 am
*yawn* Let me know when you are done having your little meltdown. I'll wait... :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:43 am
hey, faux, here's an opportunity to change your avatar to something that describes your time on this site: http://www.salvospeak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/eatcrow.gif
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:40 am
Did I break the b***on that I pushed because I slammed you so hard. Poor widdle baby.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:40 am
see comment #68858 above
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:39 am
as opposed to your "stoolio" comment above? Yeah, it's all me. bwahahahahahaha. Wait, now I get it, do you just type without knowing what you type or have someone type your comments for you?
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:36 am
You mean to say you watch TV? Ya don't say... :-D I know you are just a toy, but some times you an almost fool me. You almost convince me you are a real person. Almost. ;-) Love it when you hit those cymbals when your mad! Do it again, monkey! :-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:35 am
*yawn* So you're going back to calling me, Crankyhead. Got it. Now i KNOW you're p'issed off. Coming from an "Arnnatz wannabe", I'll consider the source on that one.
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:32 am
So basically you admit you're so obsessed with my opinion, you changed your avatar just for me. And that countered my original point, how? You're funny. Then again, most sore losers are. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:27 am
That's ok, cranky wannabe just keep trying to distract from your inability to prove the 97-99% of scientists agree with you crapola.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:25 am
Who needs the BBC "You got served" when you are on the site? Nice pirouette, by the way.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:24 am
I was hoping you would appreciate me using an avatar that highlights your opinion. I guess you didn't get it. Surprise, surprise.
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:23 am
Who needs a goldfish when I have you. Keep going! Dance monkey, dance! x-D Do that angry face again. So cute!! :-D
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:22 am
You went through all the trouble to dress up like a chicken this morning in the laughable hope it will mock others. Hilarious. Then you tell others to "get a life". Also hilarious. Surrrrre... I will DO that, chicken boy. Thanks for the 'heads' up. ;-)
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:22 am
Nope, basically, I was saying that you are a broken record. "opinion piece" skip "opinion piece" skip "b***ons pushed" skip "opinnion piece" skip "b***ons pushed" etc ad nauseum
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:20 am
*any links that back up"
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:20 am
Oh, and you still haven;t posted any links that bacs up that 9 out of 10 doctors recommend lucky strike" which is comparable to the made up numbers of "97% of scientists agree..." Especially when polls of scientists say differently
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 11:19 am
So, basically you are saying,"I know you were going to score in my inzone anyways so I decided to run the ball back the other way and do it for you!" Got it. Uh, thanx? It's no fun making trying to make fun of you when you do all the work for me. :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:17 am
OMG, you are right. This site means so much to you and here I was dissing you by doing something that distracted me from your repetitive bs. Get a life
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 11:16 am
and that's why I posted the follow on, I knew you would use that lame old excuse to not read it (plus it isn't some liberal obama pleasing article)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 10:57 am
Now I know I pushed your b***ons and p'issed you off if you changed your avatar just for me. LMAO! ROFLCOPTER..Youse realay ares a speshel kindaz crazy aints youse, Pinostoolio? :-D Well, thanks for starting my morning off with a good laugh X-D Cheers :-)
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 10:52 am
Let me get this straight.You dress up like a chicken(appropriate,btw,after you ran off like a coward yesterday) and you're hoping it'll insult me?LOLOLOL..Is that like punching yourself in the face and hoping it will hurt me?Please,dont stop on my account
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 10:47 am
In fact, Chicken Little, here's the thread you got caught lying about it. You remember...where you dared me to prove that article was an "opinion"... and I did. X-D LMAO http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9728&start=90#p138733
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 10:40 am
Then open your eyes, OTC. Oh, they are.lol...
fauxnews - July 14, 2014, 10:39 am
*yawn* You already posted this OPINION piece, Stoolio. Try posting some "news" for a change.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 9:55 am
And they agree because their grants stipulate that they MUST agree in order to get followup money
OTC - July 14, 2014, 9:49 am
Mote like a translation in the works
OTC - July 14, 2014, 9:47 am
Maybe they are talking about government funded scientists, 97-99% of them agree.
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 8:43 am
OMG! Fauxnews is gonna say "it's an opinion", so to counter that before he goes there: http://oss.sagepub.com/content/33/11/1477.full
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 8:41 am
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 8:22 am
Or the world is cooling ... The world is warming ... the world is disrupting climate ... duh, duh, hello, my name is fauxnews and I'm addicted to bullsh1t
EmmaRoydes - July 14, 2014, 8:21 am
How about liberals who make up numbers to support their hallucinations. Like "97-99% of scientists agree..." or "9 out of 10 doctors recommend lucky strike"
OTC - July 14, 2014, 7:06 am
Don't see hordes of scientists freaking out over man made GW either, just the liberals think it's the problem they think it is
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 11:41 pm
Don't see hordes of scientists freaking out over this. Maybe because it's not the problem you think people think it is? Digging yourself a hole here, mate.
OTC - July 13, 2014, 11:33 pm
(Not me but) the alarmists are saying cancer will increase during the flip, power grids and communications could be knocked out. With the atmosphere exposed the solar wind will blow away the MMCO2. keep moving, nothing to see here right?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 10:31 pm
My 2 cents, TA.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 10:31 pm
I'm not talking about the magnetic field stuff, which is a red herring for sure. But where knee-jerk libs really get me is their HATRED of all things nuclear which, ironically, is their ONLY solution to the problems facing the world. Windmills wont cut it
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 10:29 pm
I think the scientists on climate change are on the money with this. Where I fault the liberal alarmists on this is the politics: clearly there is a problem, one of the biggest of which is the need to get off energy co-dependency, like, as in NOW.
terroraustralis - July 13, 2014, 10:23 pm
i just want to emphasise, again, you're doing literally the exact same thing that you get pissed off at climate change alarmists for doing. if this is some meta attempt to show everyone how climate change alarmists appear to you, then well done.
terroraustralis - July 13, 2014, 10:22 pm
the only difference is that the climate change alarmists have scientific studies backing up their claims of danger, whereas there are none backing up the notion that the magnetic field flip will be dangerous.
terroraustralis - July 13, 2014, 10:20 pm
i really dont understand why you made this poster... you get pissed off at "climate change alarmists" and yet you post alarmist bull**** about the flip... the flip is harmless, you're doing literally the exact same thing climate change alarmists do.
OTC - July 13, 2014, 8:16 am
Wasn't trying to tie the flip to climate change
terroraustralis - July 13, 2014, 2:32 am
the best translation i could find for this poster was "i have no f***ing idea what i'm talking about". the earth's magnetic field has switched polarity 172 times in earth's history, and not one of these "flips" is a**ociated with the climate at the time.
Zeitguy - July 12, 2014, 9:47 pm
Certainly not an excuse to dismiss global warming and the effect of human activity on that phenomenon.
Zeitguy - July 12, 2014, 9:08 pm
The cyclical shift of the magnetic poles is long over due. Although it may take thousands of years to complete the effects may be noticed over the next few hundred years.

Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -

Uh-oh, Greenies! -

TAGS: global warming hoax climate change scam electric cars fossil fuels carbon co2 coal powered cars alarmist fail silly greenies
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 28, 2015, 12:15 pm
I used to make this argument myself but actually, it does burn less and is more efficient to have one large plant everyone ***s into, rather than run millions of independent, small internal combustion engines. It's probably not a large difference though.

The Father of Global Warming -

Has Anybody Told the DNC What Obama’s EPA Just Announced About Airplane Emissions? -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

Climate Change: The Greatest Hoax Of The Modern Era -

Hypocrite-in-Chief -

Liberal Asininity -

The Gold Standard For Global Warming Failure -

Obama's Earth Day hypocrisy -

TAGS: obama earth day hypocrisy air force one global warming hoax climate change scam ipcc al gore elitists greenies alarmists warmists green religion cultists carbon dioxide co2 agenda21
Rating: 4.85/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:24 pm
Nope. The evidence did that. X-D You know? That annoying stuff you keep ignoring...unless, of course, it is about God or something you care about. Then you don't need proof.
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:47 pm
Guess that unequivocally proves its MMCC

Climate Commie -

IF the planet was really warming, it will make food cheaper & more plentiful -

Warmist Stupidity: World’s Biggest “Green” Power Station Not So Green -


TAGS: co2 truth carbon dioxide global warming climate change hoax junk science
Rating: 4.47/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 28, 2015, 10:11 pm
That "truth is called, ]Affirming a Disjunct.

the more CO2 there is, the more plants love it -

TAGS: 1090ppm co2 plant food
Rating: 4.44/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - April 9, 2015, 7:40 am
I can't speak for you, but since the majority of our food supply comes from annuals and NOT perennials, I'd rather help plants to grow their best during the one season they live
OTC - April 9, 2015, 7:30 am
Or this source- https://www.hydrofarm.com/resources/articles/co2_enrichment.php
OTC - April 9, 2015, 7:24 am
How about this source- http://smithsonianscience.org/2014/06/strange-controversial-way-plants-trap-co2/
MMessEnnBeeCee - April 8, 2015, 7:00 pm
Pot meet kettle
DebtToAmerica - April 8, 2015, 1:37 pm
i would care... if not for the fact that you immediately declare any website "biased" if it disagrees with the things you believe. funny how you're happy to trash my source, but you still havent posted your own source.
OTC - April 8, 2015, 12:56 pm
Skeptical science, the obviously biased website says differently? what a surprise
DebtToAmerica - April 8, 2015, 4:48 am

man-made CO2 -

TAGS: al gore co2
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by OTC

800yr lag CO2 -

TAGS: 800 year lag co2
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by OTC

The Truth About Climate Change & CO2 -

CO2 -

Thank You, Captain Obvious -

TAGS: captain obvious climate change hoax global warming scam agw greenies warmists alarmists hysterians al gore manbearpig eco fascism co2 carbon dioxide is not a pollutant
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Zeitguy - May 18, 2015, 6:00 pm
Your depth of scientific knowledge is always surprising.


TAGS: co2 truth global warming hoax climate change con al gore junk science tree huggers hippies liberals democrats progressives statism socialism carbon credits
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 7, 2015, 12:53 pm
faux, I think there are fewer young earth creationists than you think. Or at least I would hope so.
OTC - March 7, 2015, 12:41 am
beginning of the industrial revolution
OTC - March 7, 2015, 12:39 am
Prior to the little ice age temperatures were higher than they are now. in the 13th century volcanoes became active then the sun entered the maunder minimum. with less volcanism and more solar activity, the little ice age ended which coincided with the b
OTC - March 6, 2015, 6:26 pm
Around 1940 there was a cooling period and scientists warned of a coming ice age, so how can there be cooling in the middle of the industrial revolution, especially when factories were in full force during the wars?
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:42 pm
GW is real as is CC, science and history proves that. The debate is whether man is causing or contributing to it
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:22 pm
The industrial revolution began around 1750, which is also about the same time the "mini ice age" ended. You can't possibly think that man-made CO2 had that quick of an effect on warming?
OTC - March 6, 2015, 4:11 pm
I think there is a lot of confusion between MMGW/MMCC & GW/CC
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:59 pm
:-) And sorry for the stupid question. But there is a denier camp out there - the Inhofe camp - that basically says, "Global Warming isn't real cuz Gawd says so." At that point, what's the point? Cheers =)
OTC - March 6, 2015, 3:42 pm
Of course the earth is older than 6000 yrs
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:23 pm
Because that 800 year lag means nothing if, like some deniers, you fall into the creationism camp. So, OTC, out of pure curiosity, do you agree with 99.9% of scientists out there that the world is much older than 6000 years old? just curious
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 3:22 pm
DebttoAmerica brings up a good point. Here's an interesting question for you, in order to gauge your scientific objectivity. It's an easy question any rational person should be willing to answer: do you believe the world is 6000 years old?
DebtToAmerica - March 6, 2015, 3:16 pm
if there was an 800 year lag at the end of the last ice age, why isnt there a lag today? CO2 levels started rising dramatically a few decades after the start of the industrial revolution, and the global average temperatures started rising soon after.
fauxnews - March 6, 2015, 9:39 am
Save you the trouble. See poster #61904 for why you are wrong. ;-) Another half-truth, trick deniers are trying to pass off as a credible argument - a myth debunked LONG ago. You're welcome =)
OTC - March 6, 2015, 7:49 am
You can start by researching 800 year lag CO2
DebtToAmerica - March 6, 2015, 1:31 am
would you like to present the evidence you're referring to?

The Green TRUTH -

if we're going to measure atmospheric CO2 -

TAGS: false reading high co2
Rating: 4.11/5

More politifakes by OTC

calron - May 10, 2015, 1:59 am
Ug, it wasn't. I but a committee chose it, IP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauna_Loa
calron - May 10, 2015, 12:55 am
So look up the volcano's name and when it formed and history along with the date of the station's construction. It is possible it was long dormant or even formed later.
OTC - May 6, 2015, 4:13 pm
Those same scientists that say warming happens before CO2 rises? The same scientists who say CO2 is rising while temperatures have levelled off?
OTC - May 6, 2015, 4:11 pm
Didn't say anything about a conspiracy, I'm sure they placed them near volcanoes to monitor them, but lets not use them to monitor globally. Y U always read what's not there?
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 8:17 pm
No facts you say, OTC? Just wishful thinking? :-) Why would my bu.ttons be pushed? The scientists agree with me. That pesky 97% consensus you keep denying, remember? ;-) Nice try, ma'am. #projectingforonetrickponies
OTC - May 5, 2015, 6:58 pm
Speaking of but.tons, sorry I pushed yours, I was just looking for the mute but.ton :)
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 4:08 pm
Tried to push the back b***on to fix a typo before I hit send, two responses become four. Sorry for the spam, mates. I need to do a better job of clearing my browser, that's on me. See #75926 and #75928 for proper continuity. Cheers :-D
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 3:57 pm
the scientists (you know?the experts?) to use this equipment properly without letting that pesky volcano get in the way. Sometimes I really am convinced you're just parodying deniers.You should re-read your comments sometime.Crack me up, mate.Cheers (2/2)
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 3:57 pm
More anecdotal denier rubbish. Pretty sure the scientists didn't place this facility near "the volcano" as part of some conspiracy to fix the outcome, which you're implying. They're the experts, you and I are Calron are not. I think we can trust (1/2)
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 3:56 pm
More anecdotal denier rubbish. Pretty sure the scientists didn't place this facility near "the volcano" as part of some conspiracy to fix the outcome, which you're implying. They're the experts, you and I and Calron are not. I think we can trust (1/2)
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 3:53 pm
More anecdotal denier rubbish. Pretty sure the scientists didn't place this facility near "the volcano" as part of some conspiracy to fix the outcome, which you're implying. They're the experts, you and I are Calron are not. I think we can trust (1/2)
OTC - May 5, 2015, 3:38 pm
Yeah, local, not global.
calron - May 3, 2015, 11:52 pm
It could be a good chance to measure the effects on the local climate.

CO2 "causes" temperatures to rise? -

CO2 good for plants -

Don't tell liberals that more CO2 doesn't mean higher temperatures -


Global Warming Is Man-Made Up -

G l o b a l W a r m i n g I d i o t s -

The Truth about Climate Change and CO2 -

climate change: a natural cycle -

TAGS: climate change denial inhofe co2
Rating: 2.45/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 28, 2015, 3:08 pm
So the ice age is junk science now? lol

denying climate change -

Climate Change Deniers -

TAGS: climate change denial co2 wonka
Rating: 1.92/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 9:09 pm
holy f*** dude you werent joking about "spin zone". i've never seen someone strawman as hard as you just did. its like you're not even trying to hide the fact that you're a troll.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:50 pm
well, based on this thread, you really seem to enjoy using ad-hominem attacks during debates, and you dodge questions like a professional politician, and you derail discussions whenever you cannot come up with a counter argument.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:46 pm
spin zone? i thought we were in the kindergarten zone... or does that only cover comment #74146 to comment #74150 ?
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:43 pm
Let's start with the fact that you don't know anything about me, but you would like to keep conversations at a garbage dump level rather than bring them up to responsible, sensible discussions. But, hey, if that's your fancy, drive on, brother, drive on
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:40 pm
Logic is left behind and twisted, convoluted rhetoric and accusations replace common sense.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:34 pm
because its neccesary for you to make blatant lies about his posters in order to avoid losing this argument?
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:33 pm
where comments need not make sense and everyone's opinion is the only one that can possibly be correct.
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:33 pm
Welcome to the spin zone
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:32 pm
So, the bottom line is that you are of the opinion that if someone doesn't buy into MMGW, that person must be a bible thumper? Geez louise, where do you people come up with this crap?
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 8:27 pm
Who was that meant to address?
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:26 pm
and because you cant believe that some people think for themselves, you cant believe that people would voluntarily work together to refute your lies, so therefore they must be "attack dogs" working for the master conspirator Al Gore
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:23 pm
what's funny to me is that you a**ume that there must be some massive conspiracy because you honestly cannot comprehend the idea of people agreeing with the evidence.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:21 pm
you can state your position all you want, but actions speak louder than words, and the nature of your attacks indicate that you're a full blown conspiracy theorist who thinks al gore has taken over the government and is pushing his climate change agenda.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:16 pm
it reminds me of literally every argument you've ever used, "some climate change believers acts like the word of al gore is gospel! therefore you're pushing your religion on me!"
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:13 pm
why are you angry at faux for diverting the conversation to something you would enjoy?
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:11 pm
you sound surprised that your lies are pissing people off... but i'm pretty sure you're faking it, you know exactly what you're doing, endlessly repeating blatant lies in order to rile people up.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:06 pm
funny how none of what you said is true, and you're just blatantly making up lies to support your position... what i find unbelievable is that you think noone is going to call you out on those lies
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 8:04 pm
because its neccesary for you to misrepresent it so you can complain about it without appearing to be a complete idiot, you lack the ability to challenge the facts, which is why you rely so much on fallacies to carry your arguments.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 7:54 pm
yes, it point out that he's willing to change his view if presented with evidence that contradicts it, unlike most CC deniers who proudly claim that nothing would change their mind. its easy to attack others for their view, much harder to defend your own.
DebtToAmerica - March 28, 2015, 7:48 pm
its also behind a paywall, and its from a news outlet owned by rupert murdoch. you're practically quoting fox news, despite the fact that your username implies that you think the mainstream media is full of ****.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:24 pm
So just like. Not "So of like." Stupid me. Need more coffee. Mmmmmk, back to work. Thank you for the laughs you two :)
OTC - March 28, 2015, 4:23 pm
Where did I make that statement?
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 4:16 pm
So of like when you label every believe of MMCC a supporter of Al Gore even though he's just a politician and not an official spokesperson for science?you deny man-made climate change. That's doesn't get you labeled a denier. It's what you are doing hun
OTC - March 28, 2015, 4:09 pm
What's funny is denying Man-Made Climate Change,but believing in Climate Change, and liberals labeling you a climate change denier
calron - March 28, 2015, 4:01 pm
Senator James M. Inhofe.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 3:55 pm
MS or Inhofe?
calron - March 28, 2015, 3:47 pm
Really cause when that apple got eaten God's creation was changed by the actions of Man. So not only is he using Appeal to Authority, he's putting words in the authorities mouth.
rebeccaolsen - March 28, 2015, 3:39 pm
MS, if the rejects attacking climatologists are using the bible as their source then it is fair to challenge their source. Senator Inhofe thinks man could never alter god's creation. Uses a passage from Genesis as key evidence against GW. Derp
calron - March 28, 2015, 2:56 pm
Especially ironic because those things can explain the pause and allow for MMGW being true. Natural variability is a well known and highly excepted factor in climate.
OTC - March 28, 2015, 1:30 pm
Sounds like your projecting again faux. funny how alarmists don't accept the science of orbital cycles, solar cycles, & other events contributing to climate change, but attack others for not accepting their belief that there's only 1 cause for CC
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 28, 2015, 9:51 am
Nice Logic: Some a are b, therefore you are b. Common Core much?
Curlyrocks - March 27, 2015, 9:37 pm
Michael Mann is not head of the NOAA. He's basically the one pushing all this end of the world nonsense on us, and he has worked on projects funded by the NOAA but he is not one man who can be summed up as the NOAA.
rebeccaolsen - March 27, 2015, 6:43 pm
I wouldn't worry about it, sweetie. To support his victim narrative, EMMaEnnBeeEss conveniently forgets the many global warming deniers who use religion as an excuse to attack scientists as godless unamerican commie atheists. Can't have it both ways, mmk?
DebtToAmerica - March 27, 2015, 4:41 am
you mean like how the threat of the soviet union was blown out of proportion by war profiteers? or how the threat of radical islam was blown out of proportion by war profiteers? just because a threat is blown out of proportion doesnt mean its not real.
DebtToAmerica - March 27, 2015, 4:40 am
then its a good thing he didnt use any facts.
DebtToAmerica - March 27, 2015, 4:32 am
"wasting billions on the fears of a doomsday cult" is a matter of perspective, and just like the last few times the people responsible for detecting the threat have had a consensus on the topic, not shared by the general public.
DebtToAmerica - March 27, 2015, 4:30 am
its so much better than that doomsday cult involved in the M.A.D. showdown between the USA and the USSR, or that doomsday cult that claims islam will take over the USA and impose sharia law.
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 1:19 am
*yawn*Im aware of your agenda.Im not stupid.In this game of king of the hill you’re playing,remember what'Joshua'the computer said in Wargames:“The only winning move is NOT to play.” When ya figure that out,you'll figure ME out.Food for thought ;-) Cheers
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 1:19 am
Hmmmm.... sad? Really? *chortle* Want to know what is "sad?" ;-) Then I got to go...got a big work week ahead of me...so, if you must, we can continue this next week, but...if you want to know what "sad" is: read [comment #74157]
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 1:17 am
Well, it's off to bed now, been fun. We should do this again sometime. I need these kinds of laughs once in a while
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 1:12 am
and to add insult to injury, you accuse me of echolalia and just a couple of comments later prove that you are guilty of it. Sad, really sad.
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 1:11 am
nah, you haven't pushed any b***ons, but I do love the way you inject that whenever someone doesn't agree with you. Kind of pathetic and funny at the same time.
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 1:08 am
*yawn* sounds like your b***ons were pushed. If so, sorry, I didn't mean to rile you up. X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 1:05 am
TRANSLATION (FauxNews): Gosh, I have nothing, let me try diverting this conversation to something a grade school kid would enjoy
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 1:04 am
Just when I thought your arguments were at the top of the lame scale, you prove me wrong and push lameness to a new level.
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 1:01 am
You are a terrible liar X-D
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 1:00 am
TRANSLATION (MMessEnnBeeCee): Now I'm REALLY projecting. You can tell when I start ripping off Faux's *yawn* shtick and doing the echolalia thang X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:59 am
nope, I'm just sitting here laughing at you. :)
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:58 am
Angry, bro? :-/
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:58 am
*yawn* sounds like your b***ons were pushed. If so, sorry, I didn't mean to rile you up.
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:57 am
Using religion as an excuse for an attack is lame especially when you consider that I'm not religious
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:56 am
If it's questionable, alarmist, why do your posters and comments all claim it's gospel?
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:54 am
All science is 'questionable',denier. The bible, for instance, claims to answer all your questions. Science will question all your answers. Food for thought, mate ;-)
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:53 am
Oh, no! How...will...I...recover. The shame. ;-) #MMessEnnBeeCee'sb***onspushedbestofmoments
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:52 am
*yawn* your use of the word yet implies that the "science" is questionable
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:51 am
Chat with you and your "friends" sometime next week if I get the chance. In the meanwhile, thank you for taking the time to show interest in my poster, mate! Have a good one =)
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:50 am
*yawn* That's true of EVERY, ANY scientific 'theory', denier. ;-) Correction - as far as ANY scientific theory goes, the KEY word (above) was 'hasn't. Until then...for all practical purposes, it's accepted as true by science. But, nice try, mate. Cheers
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:49 am
TRANSLATION (fauxnews): I don't know what projecting means
fauxnews - March 27, 2015, 12:48 am
TRANSLATION (MMessEnnBeeCee): I'm projecting.
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:47 am
don't confuse alarmists by using facts, otc, it just riles them up.
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 27, 2015, 12:46 am
the key word in your comment is "yet"
OTC - March 26, 2015, 9:05 pm
Oh I accept the science of climate change, just not the biased science that there's only one reason for it happening.
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 6:40 pm
You not wanting to accept the science or you not understanding the science is NOT the same thing as it being wrong. OK..lol..my weekend of sorts is over.Now back to work for the next few days.See ya next week sometime.Nice chatting with you,mate!Cheers =)
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 6:34 pm
*yawn* Yes, I get that the facts push your b***ons, mate. But as you already know...the scientific consensus on climate change isn't a poll or a survey, denier. lol So, there you go again. Stop trying to confuse others into thinking politics is science.
OTC - March 26, 2015, 6:28 pm
Don't mind faux, he thinks scientific proof comes from polling data, no hypotheses needed
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 2:23 pm
P.S. BTW...that 'guy' IS the NOAA. It is their official site. ;-)
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 2:22 pm
...A theory stands until properly disproven. Climate change theory hasn't been debunked yet. Remember, emotional thinking (ie. theocratic thinking) offers to answer all your questions. All science says is that your answers will be questioned. Cheers, mate
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 2:20 pm
...that means uncertainty and skepticism must be held about every theory, even atomic theory, even climate change. But if 97% of the world's doctors told you that you only have 3 years to live if you don't get an organ transplant, you'd still listen to'em
fauxnews - March 26, 2015, 2:19 pm
By your logic, there is no way to actually prove ANYTHING in science. That's how science works. It's all theory. Even the best ones, are still theory. It's not about proving, it's about probability it is true....
Curlyrocks - March 26, 2015, 1:39 pm
There's no way to actually prove scientifically that extreme weather is caused by Man made climate change, so even the most knowledgeable scientists are at best guessing about how much GW is human caused.
Curlyrocks - March 26, 2015, 1:37 pm
Curlyrocks - March 26, 2015, 1:37 pm
So this guy is doing the same thing as you, when the NOAA doesn't officially draw a connection between extreme weather and man made climate change he just makes it up and bad mouths the NOAA for not saying what he wanted.
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:36 pm
...Just as 'the right' shouldn't pretend there is NOT a scientific consensus. They just don't agree with it. Cheers mate.
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:34 pm
...and I think THAT IS valid. Just because science weighed in on this doesn't mean everyone will buy into their outlook. Again, the scientific debate is over but the POLITICAL debate is far from over. And the left shouldn't a**ume it is OR should be.
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:32 pm
And that's a great point, most of the scientific community has moved on about man-made climate change. The debate is over for them, with the exception of a handful of naysayers. But the POLITICAL debate is FAR from over...
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:31 pm
...All science is theory, and yes,that means even the best theories MUST accept a certain degree of uncertainty. But at one point, annoyed by the deniers, the NOAA site even says about it's conclusions, "There is no scientific debate on this point"
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:29 pm
I could go on and ON and list more from them, but the correlation is there. I could find a loop hole in the semantics about atomic theory, but that doesn't mean atoms don't exist and I can't see atoms with the n**** eye...so...
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:27 pm
And, on the NOAA site, also this>>>"The greenhouse effect is unquestionably real...Water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas, followed by carbon dioxide and other trace gases." In the section of their site that precedes this.
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:23 pm
www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/global-warming.php So...on their OWN site, this>>>"Human activity has been increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (mostly carbon dioxide from combustion of coal, oil, and gas)"
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:13 pm
Also, "The Australian presents varying views on climate change, including giving space to articles and authors who AGREE with the scientific consensus..." So, again, not sure value this has other than as a *yawn* political opinion on this. Cheers
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:12 pm
As for RUPERT MURDOCH's 'The Australian,"Chris Mitchell has said that the editorial and op-ed pages of the newspaper are conservative leaning."
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:08 pm
The NOAA isn't disputing their conclusions in the matter, as in the quote attributed to them above. I'm not sure I understand where you are coming from :-/ Please correct me if I'm wrong, mate. I just don't see it, and I'm using the same tools as u.Cheers
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:07 pm
Will all due respect, Curly, NASA and the NOAA and every major scientific organization would disagree with you on that. Do you have an actual quote from the NOAA which says "there is no credible connection between human activities and climate change"?
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 10:05 pm
The word "OPINION" says it all. Also, look at the credentials of the source (biased as h'ell). Sorry but OP-EDs blogs, tabloids don't speak for the scientific community. #SOURCEFAIL
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 25, 2015, 10:00 pm
Yes, it's an opinion page, but it still has some pretty compelling arguments
MMessEnnBeeCee - March 25, 2015, 10:00 pm
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 9:23 pm
correlation between the two, people just draw their own conclusions on what's happaning and why
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 9:22 pm
NO THEY DID NOT ACKNOWLEDGE A CONNECTION! your doing the exact thing that pisses me off you took data from 2 studies and drew your own correlation. The NOAA said that storms are getting worse and that CO2 is on the rise but there's no scientific 1/2
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 8:29 pm
I dont care as much if people disagree w/the science.But when the scientific community's almost unanimous in this regard,and people start saying "IT'S A HOAX" or "IT'S A CONSPIRACY" or just lie about what they say, that's just delusional.My 2 cents.Cheers
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 8:27 pm
(another excerpt)"...the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and many others,say greenhouse gas levels are rising due to human activities such as burning fossil fuels & deforestation" Sounds to me the NOAA acknowledges the connection
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 8:10 pm
"Changes in the earth's climate are increasing at a steady rate,Natl'Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)warned Thursday in a new report.Greenhouse gas emissions, sea levels,global temperatures and super storms all are trending upward,NOAA said."
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 5:22 pm
it is. Much like how religious people ignore the part where god says to love each other and figure he wants people out in the street screaming at [email protected]'s. It's not about saving the world it's about making people doing things they don't like stop.
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 5:20 pm
Bot even the NOAA is denying that man made CO2 is the cause of droughts or storms, so obviously not enough people are actually listening to the scientists and are just drawing their own conclusions on what's happening, why it's happening and who's fault
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 3:49 pm
I agree with you that the politics is screwed on this, on both sides. Especially with the left. But the SCIENCE has got this correct, even if the POLITICS has not. In any case, nice chatting with you, mate. :-) Have a good day. Cheers =)
fauxnews - March 25, 2015, 3:47 pm
I agree that the left has a lot of hypocrisy to account for: their green energy lunacy, Obama's him and her private jets to Presidential gigs. But I don't think it proves that the SCIENCE is wrong about its consensus about man-made GW.
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 2:28 pm
The truth is if every global warming alarmist lived as eco friendly as they preach then they actually could save the world. The Koch brothers arn't the ones burning all the oil. It's not about living better it's about telling others how to live.
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 2:26 pm
don't approve of and blame an up coming apocalypse on them, and their way of life ignoring the fact that they are the ones buying the oil, the same way Christians blame an up coming rapture on [email protected], ignoring their own sinful behavior of hate.
Curlyrocks - March 25, 2015, 2:15 pm
And they had "the word of god". and in much the same way as GW science, it was misinterpreted and blown out of proportion by the greedy and ignorant. Bad alarmists (which is most of them) focus on the fact that rich people are living a lifestyle they.
fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 5:55 pm
...If not on a political parody site, then where else? My 2 cents. Always good sparring with you mate. Have a good day, Cheers =)
fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 5:54 pm
Climatology is far from a cult. And most deniers are closet theocrats that believe in an immortal Jesus and a 6000 year old world. When they use science to make their claims but ignore how ridiculous their own views are, I think its fair game to tease'em

Man-made CO2 "causes" temperatures to rise? -